Deadmon

>http://youtu.be/oRL6ivUFhVw good BF3 BF4 comparison

BF3 also came out in october of 11. Not a yearly push release like CoD. If you also look at past history this isnt too far off... 1942 (2002) vietnam (2004) bf2 (2005) 2142 (2006) bad company (2008) bc2 (2010) bf3 (2011) and thats not including the tons of expansions and 2 free play games heroes and bfp4f Its also worth noting that almost all of them bring something new to the series in terms of development. Frostbite improvements, damage imrpovements, game mechanics, ect. CoD has used the same engine with almost no new changes to it since CoD2

based on previous naming standards itd probably be BF2143 ;p And yeah that would be amazing if they made it larger scale like these BF3-4 games. I -loved- the dual sights in MoH:Warfighter. Small Ironsights, small red-dots, combined with ACOG or other scoped was awesome. Luckily I dont recall it being on any snipers just the ARs. We dont know much about the engine but depending on what they improve I dont wanna dub it down as 3.5 for the same reason BC and BC2 are diff games ;p If anything, with the addition of naval assets(presumably) and the large improvements they are seemingly making(like the complete upset with the "destruction" in BF3) I feel like BF3 was simply a publicity stunt to get people looking back at their game over CoD before BF4 was released as a real show of force :P Either way. Clowning on CoD. lol.

yes I was serious. The very end like after 16:55 seconds the BF3 theme noise was waaaaaay too bass and there was a lot of other noise going on that cluttered the sound. It just isnt good :P

>http://youtu.be/U8HVQXkeU8U 4:50 shows off secondary optics on weapons like in warfighter (in this case a 2'o clock ironsight) 4:50 just before that, a destroyed gas tank of some sort blows a hole in the side of a building (destruction upgrade) 6:00 flexing graphics engine nuts with a bunch of birds and pretty destroyed buildings 6:44 squad commands for SP IE more tactical experience? 6:55 small scale destruction showcase (shotgun wood wall then 40mm cement wall) 6:30 squad controls confirmed 9:19 oooooohhhhh preetttyyyy 11:40 Hey lots of destruction while this heli shoots at me 12:35 interactive scripted moments? 13:53 Ffffin civilians 14:19 amateur surgeon 15:05 ironic song/action sequence time 16:21 hello phone? this is spec ops (reveals china and russia are primary antagonists?) end: Terrible terrible bf theme noise. Essentially confirms its going to be a prettier BF3 in terms of visual style, theme, ect (I think I even saw some re-used hostile models). On the plus side it looks like they are adding a lot more than just refined graphics. Destruction, gameplay functions, potential addition of sea to MP, cool optics and animations from warfighter.

naval combat added? in SP that would be no shock. In MP tha would be epic. They released 3 videos for "Land" "Sea" and "Air" which they are playing up a ton, its looking like sea may indeed be in MP? >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WZgo0KnEwA&feature=share&list=PLLpjKzWIuEfl4CwBX3gf0RZsdFW1AHKJh >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3z4jxkkrrKM&feature=share&list=PLLpjKzWIuEfl4CwBX3gf0RZsdFW1AHKJh >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAOpn_gmKkw&feature=share&list=PLLpjKzWIuEfl4CwBX3gf0RZsdFW1AHKJh just short CG teasers to play up the 3 aspects. A lot of effort if Sea were just SP

Posting things as they are revealed. It unfortunately looks like a prettier BF3. Rumors that Frostbite 3.0 is being run, with noticibly improved destruction. >http://youtu.be/ZD9fWUUeL00 Low quality leaked short trailer Unisex soldiers. MP possible.

researched out of curiosity and Im seeing a common claim that the only difference between instant and charged fire on the striker right now is projectile speed/drop with fully charged being no drop and near instant.

are they damaging for their entire lifetime? or just initial impacts? I only ask because they stay there -forever- and if they are continuously damaging thats super Ffffed lol.

not to mention they can charge the extra damage behind cover so charge time isnt super relevant. Faster will only make them much more effective. I havent played against them so I dont know if theres any visual distinction between charge levels. Assuming they dont? If thats the case then being hit by 4 default level fast-fire lasers is standard. Ive heard accounts of prowlers taken out from 2 fully charged from side angles.

lancer is getting a range and charge speed buff. the ADS thing he mentioned is a fix. Apparently it breaks sometimse when switching in and out of ADS.

http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/03/19/the-elder-scrolls-online-just-might-be-awesome

If anyone wants LITE (single player) add DeadmonTellem on Steam

I know its a test, Im just giving constructive critique / tossing ideas. Like I said it looks really cool!

thats a cool effect. Maybe if it faded in or particles "Created" the logo? Its a little static for an intro symbol but either way still looks awesome.

http://store.steampowered.com/app/208580/?snr=1_550_552&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter The steam daily deal for the day is 66% off KOTOR 2. So $3.40. Not -MASSIVE- savings but its so cheap its worth the random star wars kotor game nostalgia ;p

wasteland servers are the most populated right now. Sandbox pew pew

xoza the NDA police

yeah, People think alpha is part of the game name. ;p

Twitchy caleb and I all played for a small bit last night. Works fine.

really dont have the cash to spend on it but I know im going to end up getting that deluxe edition before the end of the countdown tonight :[

no no. I wasnt advocating they water it down. Simply saying that while the game is going to be badass for sure I dont think its playerbase will be much larger than Arma II. Like I said Im getting it too, just being realistic in terms of expectations. :P In terms of DLC / credits chat I was just highlighting little exceptions they hid to the side to help people purchase the right pack. As I see it the deluxe is best value as most arma success come from mods or base version / stand alone versions.

Well then yes it is wrong haha. I didnt bother to look because I dont have the cash to pre-order right now. Either way. Its first 500 so I would expect it to go within an hour. If you arent ordering it as it opens up then I wouldnt consider it when weighing the options.

a note on the name in game credits, it says first 500 to purchase. I would -highly- expect that 500 has already been met. DLC says "If any, does not apply to standalone expansions or sequels" The standalone expansions part is whats shitty about it. Wasnt arrowhead standalone? @Agares: yes the UI is less cumbersome. That doesnt mean the game is watered-down in terms of need to know controls, realism, ect. Something that most gamers dont want to deal with. Especially the travel-time involved in arma. Im fully planning on getting AIII, but I have no expectation for its playerbase to be huge.

shoulda gone with: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=69.99+euro+to+US