Jayce Iredell Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 I have discovered that we may benefits from a place where we could field test Titan Products and screen them for bugs and or use them to recreate bugs that our consumers report, thoughts?(This may be a moot point, but I wanted to bring it up just incase) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trevor Russell Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 Agreed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheeso Szydlowska Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 I usually bugtest shit on Titan. It's so much more fun for a weapon to misfire horribly and kill everyone by accident. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anlysia Gregoire Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 Liiiiiiiike...the firing range? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agares Tretiak Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 The firing range doesn't recreate various necessary combat conditions.I would go a step further, and suggest there is a set process or criterium that a product should meet or undergo prior to release. This will increase uniformity in terms of quality. It shouldn't be too long a list, either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kristian Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 New Jessie? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agares Tretiak Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 No. I'd rather see them tested in Titan or during training exercises. This maintains certain necessary baselines of controllable factors, making for a better environment in which to gather data. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyphre Iredell Posted February 25, 2009 Share Posted February 25, 2009 Operation in lag is not a controllable factor, and still necessary for testing at peak and base conditions. It will take more than one front in order to test weapons in all necessary aspects. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agares Tretiak Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 Yes, but in titan, we can add or subtract lag factors as needed. New jessie is so random, you may not be able ot isolate the source. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyphre Iredell Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 No no, wouldn't need to isolate anything, just test it under typical extreme conditions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trevor Russell Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 I usually bugtest shit on Titan. It's so much more fun for a weapon to misfire horribly and kill everyone by accident....that's sorta not allowed -_- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agares Tretiak Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 The entire point of a test (or experiment) is that it is done under quantifiable conditions and a controlled environment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyphre Iredell Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 Tests are also done under the worst possible conditions in an attempt to bring about any unwanted change. And since we don't have a magical box that lag can be contained in, it needs to be done in areas where it is already a problem. Its not about attempting to figure out some specific error, that can be done in just test-firing anywhere, its about testing to see if it still operates. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agares Tretiak Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 Which can be easily done on Titan. You're not going to just test to see if it functions in lag, but also how it works in a tough combat situation. Anyway, it also keeps prying eyes at bay, if you're worried about unscrupulous copy cats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cyphre Iredell Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 (edited) No mention of only testing in such conditions ever occurred in previous statements. Edited February 27, 2009 by Cyphre Iredell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
