Tsume Xiao Posted September 20, 2009 Share Posted September 20, 2009 Keep Latin.Period D:If you want change,then maybe change out Sesquip and Terrarium, but leave the classics we have had since for ever (Decurion,Centurion, ect, ect) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sera Otoro Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 i like the current rankings... changing them to the modern day rankings would kind of lean us away from being unique in terms of rank names... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vinnie Lei Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 I don't know. I can imagine new names would make things much easier, but I do love the uniqueness these names are giving. It defines as something unique and I like that.I wouldn't mind too much to see it changed, but I'd prefer the cool names as they are. Sesquiplicarius ain't too hard to spell once you learn to remember it :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kytec Switchblade Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 if it changes them back to the way we originally had it back in the day yes change, if its a whole new set that sounds too police force'y then no thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter Abrams Posted October 25, 2009 Share Posted October 25, 2009 I say no. Keep them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Furry Thor Posted October 27, 2009 Share Posted October 27, 2009 I would rather keep our current ranking structure. It matches us perfectly and sets us apart from most other militaries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keystone Gray Posted October 28, 2009 Share Posted October 28, 2009 Change is not always a good thing; rather, only when there is purpose. Our current nomenclature works, and it is unique. Why change it? Afterall, we are not a simple copy-paste of a real world military. The Mercz wouldn't dare change their rank nomenclature, either; it is indicative of their theme, as is ours.If it ain't broke, don't fix it. We really do not need to replace everything for the sake of replacing it. Seriously. Some things are in place because they work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trinity Heckroth Posted November 26, 2009 Share Posted November 26, 2009 Our ranking structure is fine how it is. It sets us apart from all the generic military groups, lends an air to the theme of our group, and makes us more unique. Change for the sake of change is not always a good thing. "If it ain't broke, don;t fix it."I voted no. Keep it as it is. Even Sesquiplicarius. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayce Iredell Posted November 26, 2009 Share Posted November 26, 2009 I deleted and changed my vote, I realize upcoming academies and such will change the way our group functions for the better. This will probably mean we could see more ranks added to the structure. This is in particular regards to the promotion requirements, and the upcoming NCO-A (Cough cough, get on it Gunnie.) no longer will being E-4 or higher just be another rank, in the ordo it will mean you worked your ass off and earned your place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trinity Heckroth Posted June 2, 2010 Share Posted June 2, 2010 Old topic is old, issue has been settled. Close thread plz? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inoue Katsu Posted June 2, 2010 Share Posted June 2, 2010 Closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
