Zerowinged Vasiliev Posted September 19, 2010 Share Posted September 19, 2010 (edited) Quoting the Standing Orders Thread06SEP09-I: It is not permissible for Ordo Imperialis personnel to dual wield weaponry, unless: a. melee/firearm combination. b. two semi-automatic pistol grade firearms.Clarification on point A:This is only allowed when said fire arm is a one handed weapon. Example: Pistol + Sword = OKAssault Rifle + Sword = Not OKNote: Edited for easier readability.Edit: Corrected via Tsume Xiao. Edited September 20, 2010 by Zerowinged Vasiliev Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aryte Posted September 20, 2010 Share Posted September 20, 2010 (ITS NEGOTIABLE IF YOU'RE SPENDING MONEY ON TI PRODUCTS TO SUPPORT YOUR SIM~ :D .. . . ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dascede Posted September 20, 2010 Share Posted September 20, 2010 (ITS NEGOTIABLE IF YOU'RE SPENDING MONEY ON TI PRODUCTS TO SUPPORT YOUR SIM~ :D .. . . )I am dissapoint. ): Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acheron Gloom Posted September 20, 2010 Share Posted September 20, 2010 (edited) (ITS NEGOTIABLE IF YOU'RE SPENDING MONEY ON TI PRODUCTS TO SUPPORT YOUR SIM~ :D .. . . )I am appoint. Edited September 20, 2010 by Acheron Gloom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Williamca Zenovka Posted September 20, 2010 Share Posted September 20, 2010 (ITS NEGOTIABLE IF YOU'RE SPENDING MONEY ON TI PRODUCTS TO SUPPORT YOUR SIM~ :D .. . . )I APPROVE OF THIS MESSAGE FROM OUR SPONSERS AT TI. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsume Xiao Posted September 20, 2010 Share Posted September 20, 2010 a. melee/firearm combination. This is only allowed when said fire arm is a one handed weapon. Example: Pistol + Sword = OKAssault Rifle + Sword = Not OK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zerowinged Vasiliev Posted September 20, 2010 Author Share Posted September 20, 2010 (ITS NEGOTIABLE IF YOU'RE SPENDING MONEY ON TI PRODUCTS TO SUPPORT YOUR SIM~ :D .. . . )*beats Aryte with a potato* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acheron Gloom Posted September 20, 2010 Share Posted September 20, 2010 (edited) *beats Aryte with a potato*Yeah, stay on topic mister.This is a good topic, because the other day I saw someone using two assault rifles and I had to remind them that they can't. Edited September 21, 2010 by Acheron Gloom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agares Tretiak Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 I will dispense beatings if things do not remain on topic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RazorFox Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 (ITS NEGOTIABLE IF YOU'RE SPENDING MONEY ON TI PRODUCTS TO SUPPORT YOUR SIM~ :D .. . . )To clarify, does this mean that the TI Glock 18Cs (which are amazing and everyone should buy them) are acceptable in spite of being very, very full-auto? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickel Reed Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 To clarify, does this mean that the TI Glock 18Cs (which are amazing and everyone should buy them) are acceptable in spite of being very, very full-auto? They're not "dual wielded", they're "twin-linked". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsume Xiao Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 They're not "dual wielded", they're "twin-linked".They are not linked. >:( Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickel Reed Posted September 21, 2010 Share Posted September 21, 2010 They are not linked. >:(I was trying to joke, but apparently it didn't work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aryte Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 I approve. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trinity Heckroth Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 I was trying to joke, but apparently it didn't work. I totally got it. It made me giggle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zerowinged Vasiliev Posted September 22, 2010 Author Share Posted September 22, 2010 4srs. Clarification is needed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickel Reed Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 4srs. Clarification is needed.In Warhammer 40000 a weapon can be "twinlinked". The techniques vary but what it all comes down to is that you have two identical weapons firing at the same target. What it does rules-wise is that you get another chance to hit by virtue of throwing more projectiles at the target.So a pistol in each hand could be considered a twin-linked pistol. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsume Xiao Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 In Warhammer 40000 a weapon can be "twinlinked". The techniques vary but what it all comes down to is that you have two identical weapons firing at the same target. What it does rules-wise is that you get another chance to hit by virtue of throwing more projectiles at the target.So a pistol in each hand could be considered a twin-linked pistol.This isn't 40K. >.>Linked implies that the trigger mechanisms are shared, so the weapons fire from one trigger, but are otherwise separate entities.For example there is a paintball turret that is basically 3 automatic guns linked to a single trigger.That's Linked.Two completely separate guns, one in each hand, that's not linked. Tats dual wielding. One gun can function perfectly without the other. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nrom Normandy Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 Okay, you guys are getting seriously off topic with that. It was a joke, please drop it.Bump to remind people. I've seen folks using those swords from Corsi while using assault rifles. That is a violation of this policy. Please correct it, before I have to send you an IM to correct it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...