I agree, to a certain extent. I think it should be a case by case basis. I mean if for say, the IEA Director is a good match for being in a Divisional level command position, then I should think that person would get it. In a military based setting, fair is not always equal. Experience and job performance go a long way also. With that being said, if someone is just taking up the positions to take them and there are other candidates who want a shot and they are qualified - then I believe the person who meets the qualifications, is able to preform the job and has no other command level obligations - those are the folks who should take priority over being given a leadership spot. Everyone is entitled to thrive in this organization if they try and people will get as much rank and as much leadership opportunity as they want....or as little as they want. But yeah, unless there is some reason why a current leadership holder would kick aside someone who isn't, then there should be some sort of limit. But, being a leader is not always about commanding or being in charge or having your name next to something. People will always be able to tell a real leader from a 'positional' leader. The harsh reality of leadership is; your men may listen to you because you have the rank and the position, but the real leader is the one your men trust and they respect. That is not always the person with the rank.